Of course LRC isn't a speed demon either, but at least it's consistently "slower". Of course, lag at times was also a problem, where I'd adjust exposure for example, and it may take a second or two for it to respond, and in some cases, it seemed like it was playing dead for a few seconds until I went out of the Edit module and back in. I will note that I don't have a dedicated graphics card as I'm relying on the CPU graphics as I have the Ryzen 5600G which uses some system memory for vdieo card use, so it's possible that Neo just utilizes the video card more than LRC). (Again, this is the latest release, not the initial / preview release). It was just a bit surprising, for a catalog with only 10 images and about 8 edits to a single image. Has anyone else seen this high resource usage by Neo? I have 32GB so I'm not really concerned, but I Do multi-task and with PS, LRC and Neo open, I can see myself easily using 3/4 of it (although I haven't seen a slow-down yet). I wasn't doing anything extreme, just a sky replacement and some other tweaks (I know the software uses "software AI" for some things) but this was bit surprising, considering that in LR, with about 10,000 images LR Classic only seems to consume about 8GB of RAM, that's either editing, culling the catalog or whatever. So I finally downloaded the updated Luminar NEO the other day and was playing around with it, I had maybe 10 photos in the "catalog" and was dong some edits and decided to open up a Task Manager (on Windows) and noticed that Neo was using darn near 10GB of memory. Not really a question, but more an observation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |